People v Clinton Humphrey

Annotate this Case
People v Humphrey 2005 NY Slip Op 09331 [24 AD3d 469] December 5, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 15, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Clinton Humphrey, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), rendered May 11, 2004, convicting him of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

As part of his plea agreement, the defendant effectively waived appellate review of his claim that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Muniz, 91 NY2d 570 [1998]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]; People v Thorpe, 2 AD3d 467 [2003]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.