People v Steven Garrett

Annotate this Case
People v Garrett 2005 NY Slip Op 09005 [23 AD3d 579] November 21, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Steven Garrett, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered December 11, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in making its Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]), as it struck a proper balance between the probative value of the evidence of the defendant's criminal history and the possible prejudice against him (see People v Powell, 4 AD3d 489, 490 [2004]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Krausman, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.