People v Frank Morton

Annotate this Case
People v Morton 2005 NY Slip Op 08346 [23 AD3d 411] November 7, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Frank Morton, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered September 4, 2003, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, petit larceny, and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention regarding the preliminary instructions given to the jury (see CPL 270.40; People v Robinson, 8 AD3d 502 [2004]), and we decline to review such claim in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]; People v Giddens, 202 AD2d 976 [1994]; People v Moore, 161 AD2d 733, 734 [1990]).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or do not warrant reversal. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.