Rubiela Garcia v Cape Hampton, LLC

Annotate this Case
Garcia v Cape Hampton, LLC 2005 NY Slip Op 05256 [19 AD3d 543] June 20, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Rubiela Garcia et al., Respondents,
v
Cape Hampton, LLC, Respondent. Emptage & Associates, Inc., Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the proposed intervenor, Emptage & Associates, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated October 28, 2003, as denied the motion of the defendant Cape Hampton, LLC, to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7).

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellant is not aggrieved by the order appealed from (see CPLR 5511). Its motion to intervene and to join in the motion by Cape Hampton, LLC, was not considered by the Supreme Court and therefore is not before this Court. Schmidt, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.