People v Charles Smith

Annotate this Case
People v Smith 2005 NY Slip Op 01750 [16 AD3d 440] March 7, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Charles Smith, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered May 13, 2002, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Feldman, J.), of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

"Showup procedures which are close in time and location to the scene are permissible in the interest of prompt identification" (People v Williams, 258 AD2d 543, 543-544 [1999]; see People v Gonzalez, 210 AD2d 168 [1994]). In the instant case, the showup occurred right outside the scene of the incident and shortly thereafter. The defendant failed to demonstrate that the showup was unduly suggestive (see People v Mitchell, 185 AD2d 249, 251 [1992]).

The defendant's remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.