People v Vincent Moreno

Annotate this Case
People v Moreno 2005 NY Slip Op 01746 [16 AD3d 438] March 7, 2005 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 18, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Vincent Moreno, Appellant.

—[*1]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered September 6, 2002, convicting him of murder in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The evidence adduced at trial established that during the course of an attempt to rob the victim of his necklace and in furtherance thereof, the defendant shot the victim from approximately two to three feet away and the victim died from a single gunshot wound to the throat. The defendant was convicted of murder in the first degree (see Penal Law § 125.27 [1] [a] [vii]). The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his request to charge manslaughter in the first degree (see Penal Law § 125.20 [1]) to the jury as a lesser-included offense (see CPL 300.50 [1], [2]). He also contends that the sentence imposed was excessive.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant (see People v Martin, 59 NY2d 704, 705 [1983]), there was no reasonable view of the evidence to support a finding that the defendant intended to cause serious physical injury to the victim rather than to kill him (see People v Wheeler, 257 AD2d 673 [1999]; People v Kelly, 221 AD2d 661, 662 [1995]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly refused to charge manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Cozier, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.