People v Jamie Ramirez

Annotate this Case
People v Ramirez 2004 NY Slip Op 09531 [13 AD3d 1236] Decided on December 20, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 20, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
MYRIAM J. ALTMAN
GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN
THOMAS A. ADAMS
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2000-05892
2003-06983

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Jamie Ramirez, appellant. (Ind. No. 1546/00)




Laura R. Johnson, New York, N.Y. (Laura Boyd of counsel), for
appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y.
(Francis F. Caputo and Dona B.
Morris of counsel; Blaire A. Cahn
on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from (1) a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), imposed June 15, 2000, and (2) an amended sentence of the same court imposed October 21, 2002, on the ground that the sentence and the amended sentence are excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence and the amended sentence are affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN, ADAMS and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.