Gabor Simon Hirsch v Monroe Bus Corp.

Annotate this Case
Hirsch v Monroe Bus Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 09467 [13 AD3d 486] December 20, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Gabor Simon Hirsch et al., Respondents,
v
Monroe Bus Corp. et al., Appellants.

—[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated December 10, 2003, which denied their motion, in effect, to vacate their default in answering the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their default and a meritorious defense (see Chiulli v Coyne, 292 AD2d 413, 414 [2002]; J.P. Equip. Rental & Materials v Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co., 288 AD2d 187 [2001]). The defendants failed to offer a reasonable excuse for their default. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently denied their motion.

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Schmidt, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.