Elias M. Gregorio v J.M. Dennis Construction Company, Corp.

Annotate this Case
Gregorio v J.M. Dennis Constr. Co. Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 09462 [13 AD3d 480] December 20, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

Elias M. Gregorio, Appellant,
v
J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp., Respondent. (And Other Titles.)

—[*1]In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burke, J.), dated September 19, 2003, as denied that branch of his motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the defendant J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. raised a triable issue of fact as to the proximate cause of the subject accident (see Cajamarca v Interconex, Inc., 8 AD3d 602 [2004]; Aslam v Weiss, 308 AD2d 426 [2003]; Castronovo v Doe, 274 AD2d 442 [2000]; Skalko v Marshall's Inc., 229 AD2d 569, 570-571 [1996]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 240 (1).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.