People v Clarence C. Jones

Annotate this Case
People v Jones 2004 NY Slip Op 09313 [13 AD3d 469] December 13, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 23, 2005

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Clarence C. Jones, Appellant.

—[*1]Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau Court (O'Shaughnessy, J.), rendered April 11, 1980, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Samenga, J.), of those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his statement to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the hearing court erred in denying those branches of his omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and his confession is only partially preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the recovery of a weapon and the defendant's confession were not the fruit of an unlawful arrest (see People v Ketcham, 93 NY2d 416, 419 [1999]; People v Maldonado, 86 NY2d 631, 635-636 [1995]).

The defendant's remaining contentions either are not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Goldstein, Smith and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.