Joanne S. Baker v Monarch Life Insurance Company

Annotate this Case
Baker v Monarch Life Ins. Co. 2004 NY Slip Op 08826 [12 AD3d 630] November 29, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Joanne S. Baker, Formerly Known as Joanne S. Berenberg, Appellant,
v
Monarch Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, to recover benefits under a disability insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), entered September 18, 2003, which denied her motion for leave to renew the defendant's prior motion for reargument which resulted in an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew since she did not offer a reasonable justification for her failure to submit the additional evidence presented upon renewal in opposition to the defendant's original motion for summary judgment or its motion for leave to reargue (see CPLR 2221 [e] [3]; Caramoor Capital Group v Blauner, 302 AD2d 550 [2003]; Falkowitz v Peters, 294 AD2d 330 [2002]; Matter of Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v Nevelus, 292 AD2d 381 [2002]). Krausman, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.