Kym Respass v James F. Dean

Annotate this Case
Respass v Dean 2004 NY Slip Op 03541 [7 AD3d 503] May 3, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, July 28, 2004

Kym Respass, Appellant,
v
James F. Dean, Defendant, and Roger C. Capozzi, Jr., Respondent.

—[*1]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (M. Garson, J.), dated April 30, 2003, which, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Roger C. Capozzi, Jr., to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff's action was not subject to the seven-year statute of limitations for crime victims provided by CPLR 213-b (1). There was no causal connection between the plaintiff's injuries and the defendant's criminal conviction (see Koerick v Lotito, 262 AD2d 367 [1999]; Boice v Burnett, 245 AD2d 980 [1997]). Thus, this action is governed by, and barred by the expiration of, the three-year period of limitations set forth in CPLR 214 (5).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff's remaining contentions. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.