Roberto Amaya v David L'Hommedieu
Annotate this CaseRoberto Amaya, Appellant,
v
David L'Hommedieu et al., Respondents.
—[*1]
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated February 7, 2003, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the sole proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries was his putting his left hand under the subject lawnmower while the blades of the lawnmower were still moving (see Liriano v Hobart Corp., 92 NY2d 232 [1998]; Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308 [1980]; Scardefield v Telsmith, Inc., 267 AD2d 560 [1999]; Breem v Long Is. Light. Co., 256 AD2d 294 [1998]). Thus, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Altman, S. Miller and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.