All State Energy v Interstate Energy Resources

Annotate this Case
All State Energy v Interstate Energy Resources 2004 NY Slip Op 02889 [6 AD3d 559] April 19, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2004

All State Energy, Inc., Appellant,
v
Interstate Energy Resources, Inc., et al., Respondents.

—[*1]In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered July 10, 2002, as, after a nonjury trial, determined that independent sales representatives hired before August 12, 1999, and the salaried employees of the defendant Interstate Energy Resources, Inc., were not its salespersons, and awarded it an accounting only of sales generated by its salespersons from August 12, 1999, through September 30, 2000.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the contract between the parties was ambiguous, and considered testimony presented by the parties at trial to interpret the terms of their agreement (see W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 160 [1990]; Weiner v Anesthesia Assoc. of W. Suffolk, 203 AD2d 455 [1994]). Considering the general purpose of the contract, the court interpreted [*2]it with reference to the whole, and properly limited the accounting awarded (see Matter of Westmoreland Coal Co. v Entech, Inc., 100 NY2d 352, 358 [2003]; State of New York v Home Indem. Co., 66 NY2d 669, 671 [1985]). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Townes, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.