Matter of Loretta Hammonds v Vincent Moore

Annotate this Case
Matter of Hammonds v Moore 2004 NY Slip Op 02212 [5 AD3d 683] March 22, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 26, 2004

In the Matter of Loretta Hammonds, Respondent,
v
Vincent Moore, Appellant.

In a support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Spinner, J.), dated April 3, 2003, as, upon directing his incarceration for contempt of court, imposed incarceration costs upon him of $197 per day.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the provision imposing incarceration costs is deleted.

Upon confirming the findings of the hearing examiner that the father was in wilful violation of an order requiring him to pay child support, the Family Court directed his incarceration for 90 days unless he purged the contempt by payment of $1,186, and further ordered the father to pay $197 per day to Suffolk County for the costs of incarceration. The father appeals from so much of the order as imposed incarceration costs.

Family Court Act § 454 does not permit the imposition of incarceration costs. As a court of limited jurisdiction, the Family Court cannot exercise powers beyond those which are granted to it by statute (see Matter of Pearson v Pearson, 69 NY2d 919 [1987]; Matter of DeMarco v Newton, 305 AD2d 501 [2003]). Altman, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.