People v Harold Lozano

Annotate this Case
People v Lozano 2004 NY Slip Op 00383 [3 AD3d 836] Decided on January 26, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on January 26, 2004
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARMENT SANDRA L. TOWNES STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ. DECISION & ORDER
2002-09383
2003-04915
2003-07608

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Harold Lozano, appellant. (Ind. Nos. 2599/01, 2606/01, and 2642/01)




Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Barry Stendig of counsel),
for appellant.
Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y.
(Sharon Y. Brodt of counsel), for
respondent.

Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from three sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), all imposed September 10, 2002, on the ground that the sentences are excessive.

ORDERED that the sentences are affirmed. No opinion.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ALTMAN, LUCIANO, TOWNES and CRANE, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.