David Hecht v 281 Scarsdale Corp.

Annotate this Case
Hecht v 281 Scarsdale Corp. 2004 NY Slip Op 00348 [3 AD3d 551] January 26, 2004 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, March 24, 2004

David Hecht, Appellant,
v
281 Scarsdale Corp. et al., Respondents.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered August 2, 2002, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment, as the overhead pipe and valve near the wall of the defendants' parking garage upon which the plaintiff struck his head was open and obvious and not inherently dangerous as a matter of law (see Cupo v Karfunkel, 1 AD3d 48 [2003]; see also Jang Hee Lee v Sung Whun Oh, 3 AD3d 473 [2004]; Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist., 293 AD2d 646 [2002]; Sorce v Great Oak Mar., 282 AD2d 598 [2001]). Therefore, the defendants had no duty to warn and did not breach their duty to maintain their property in a reasonably safe condition (see Cupo v Karfunkel, supra; Gibbons v Lido & Point Lookout Fire Dist., supra; Sorce v Great Oak Mar., supra).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, Luciano and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.