Matter of Hargis v Pritty-Pitcher
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
1063 CAF 21-00214
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. -
IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND NICOLE E. HARGIS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. -
IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,DELBERT W. HARGIS, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
(APPEAL NO. 1.)
AMBER R. POULOS, WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT AND RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
KELLY WHITE DONOFRIO LLP, ROCHESTER (DONALD A. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT VICTORIA ANN PRITTY-PITCHER AND PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.
EILEEN PERRY, FALMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT NICOLE E. HARGIS.
KIMBERLY A. WOOD, WATERTOWN, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County (Peter A. Schwerzmann, A.J.), entered December 11, 2020 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, denied the petitions seeking modification of a prior custody order.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is
unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 23, 2021
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.