Matter of Kleinbach v Cullerton

Matter of Kleinbach v Cullerton 2017 NY Slip Op 04642 Decided on June 9, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 9, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
661 CAF 16-02038

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF COURTNEY L. KLEINBACH, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

ANDREW W. CULLERTON, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ——————————————————————-



IN THE MATTER OF ANDREW W. CULLERTON, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, VCOURTNEY L. KLEINBACH, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

MICHAEL A. ROSENBLOOM, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

DAVID J. PAJAK, ALDEN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WENDY S. SISSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, GENESEO.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered June 28, 2016 in proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, denied that part of the motion of Andrew W. Cullerton seeking leave to reargue.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed, and the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Kleinbach v Cullerton ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [June 9, 2017]).

Entered: June 9, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court