Pirritano v New York State Thruway Auth.

Annotate this Case
Pirritano v New York State Thruway Auth. 2017 NY Slip Op 03281 Decided on April 28, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on April 28, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
188 CA 16-00859

[*1]JAMES PIRRITANO AND JACQUELYN PIRRITANO, CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS,

v

NEW YORK STATE THRUWAY AUTHORITY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT, AND STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.



CHIACCHIA & FLEMING, LLP, HAMBURG (DANIEL J. CHIACCHIA OF COUNSEL), FOR CLAIMANTS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

RUPP BAASE PFALZGRAF CUNNINGHAM LLC, BUFFALO (WILLIAM K. KENNEDY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.



Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Michael E. Hudson, J.), entered June 11, 2015. The order, among other things, denied claimant's motion for partial summary judgment and denied in part defendants' cross motion for summary judgment.

Now, upon the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on January 20, 2017, and filed in the Court of Claims on February 27, 2017,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: April 28, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.