Matter of Brookman v Rogers

Matter of Brookman v Rogers 2017 NY Slip Op 09084 Decided on December 22, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1526 CAF 16-00736

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM BROOKMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

SHARI ROGERS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

PETER J. DIGIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

KOSLOSKY & KOSLOSKY, UTICA (WILLIAM L. KOSLOSKY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JESSICA REYNOLDS-AMUSO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CLINTON.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Randal B. Caldwell, A.J.), entered April 5, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, suspended petitioner's visitation.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (Matter of Mary L.R. v Vernon B., 48 AD3d 1088, 1088 [4th Dept 2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 710 [2008]).

Entered: December 22, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court