Bersin Props., LLC v County of Monroe Indus. Dev. Agency

Bersin Props., LLC v County of Monroe Indus. Dev. Agency 2017 NY Slip Op 09056 Decided on December 22, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.
1465 CA 17-00513

[*1]BERSIN PROPERTIES, LLC, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

COUNTY OF MONROE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT AND EAST IRONDEQUOIT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP, NEW YORK CITY (ANDREW R. DUNLAP OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

HARTER, SECREST & EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (EDWARD F. PREMO, II, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT TOWN OF IRONDEQUOIT.

FERRARA FIORENZA PC, EAST SYRACUSE (CHARLES E. SYMONS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT EAST IRONDEQUOIT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT.

Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered June 2, 2016. The order and judgment, inter alia, granted the motion of defendant Town of Irondequoit for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it and for partial summary judgment with respect to the second through fourth counterclaims.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: December 22, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court