Martin v Witkowski
Annotate this CaseDecided on December 22, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1381 CA 14-01795
[*1]ANTOINE MARTIN, II, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
WALTER WITKOWSKI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. DEBORAH A. PUTNAM, AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER WITKOWSKI, SR., DECEASED, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
VINAL & VINAL, P.C., BUFFALO (JEANNE M. VINAL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
NASH CONNORS, P.C., BUFFALO (JAMES J. NASH OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
LAW OFFICES OF GIALLEONARDO & HARTFORD, GETZVILLE (JENNIFER V. SCHIFFMACHER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Thomas P. Franczyk, A.J.), entered April 14, 2014. The order, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff seeking leave to renew and reargue his opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint and seeking leave to amend the complaint.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Abasciano v Dandrea, 83 AD3d 1542, 1545 [4th Dept 2011]).
Entered: December 22, 2017
Mark W. Bennett
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.