Matter of Magill v Esposito

Matter of Magill v Esposito 2017 NY Slip Op 06780 Decided on September 29, 2017 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 29, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
1016 CAF 16-01227

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF MATTHEW E. MAGILL, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v

LINDSAY A. ESPOSITO, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. PAUL B. WATKINS, ESQ., ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, APPELLANT.

BRIDGET L. FIELD, ROCHESTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PAUL B. WATKINS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FAIRPORT, APPELLANT PRO SE.

THE WARD FIRM, PLLC, BALDWINSVILLE (MATTHEW E. WARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Family Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, J.), entered June 16, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, adjudged that the subject child shall primarily reside with petitioner.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 29, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court