Waldo v Kang

Annotate this Case
Waldo v Kang 2016 NY Slip Op 03618 Decided on May 6, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 6, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
330 CA 15-00829

[*1]MICHELLE M. WALDO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

MINSOO KANG AND JUNGHEE PARK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)



CELLINO & BARNES, P.C., ROCHESTER (ROBERT L. VOLTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN & KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (H. WARD HAMLIN, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered January 23, 2015. The order denied the motion of plaintiff to set aside a jury verdict.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: May 6, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.