Terwilliger v Max Co., Ltd.

Terwilliger v Max Co., Ltd. 2016 NY Slip Op 02227 Decided on March 25, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on March 25, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
210 CA 15-00897

[*1]CHARLES TERWILLIGER AND HELEN TERWILLIGER, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

MAX CO., LTD., MAX USA CORP., AND NUMAX, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN P. FREEDENBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PAUL WILLIAM BELTZ, P.C., BUFFALO (ANNE B. RIMMLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CHARLES TERWILLIGER.

LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD S. BINKO, CHEEKTOWAGA (RICHARD S. BINKO OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT HELEN TERWILLIGER.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered January 20, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the motions of plaintiffs for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, denied that part of the motion of defendants seeking summary judgment dismissing the claim of breach of implied warranty of merchantability/fitness for ordinary purposes.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Terwilliger v Max Co., Ltd. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 25, 2016]).

Entered: March 25, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court