Hamilton v Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. School Dist.

Annotate this Case
Hamilton v Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. School Dist. 2016 NY Slip Op 08766 Decided on December 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, CURRAN, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
1243 CA 15-02079

[*1]WILLIAM E. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MARY L. ALLEY, DIANA M. FOOTE, JEANNE E. PIEKLIK, PENNY L. FEENEY, CONSTANCE E. DRAKE, SUSAN A. GORTON, PAULA L. VANMINOS, LAWRENCE J. ZACHER, JAMES R. FROIO, DANNY L. MEVEC, ALICIA A. MATTIE AND MARY MADONNA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.



O'HARA, O'CONNELL & CIOTOLI, FAYETTEVILLE (STEPHEN CIOTOLI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRIAN J. BUTLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JORDAN-ELBRIDGE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, MARY L. ALLEY, DIANA M. FOOTE, JEANNE E. PIEKLIK, PENNY L. FEENEY, CONSTANCE E. DRAKE, SUSAN A. GORTON, PAULA L. VANMINOS, LAWRENCE J. ZACHER, JAMES R. FROIO, ALICIA A. MATTIE AND MARY MADONNA.

DANNY L. MEVEC, SYRACUSE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.



Appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Donald A. Greenwood, J.), entered August 7, 2015. The order and judgment, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment and granted defendants' motions for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order and judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: December 23, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.