People v Jackson

Annotate this Case
People v Jackson 2016 NY Slip Op 08712 Decided on December 23, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on December 23, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CARNI, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
1158 KA 14-00258

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

TAKIEME JACKSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.



FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (EVAN HANNAY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), rendered January 6, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree (four counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of four counts of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law

§ 160.10 [1], [2] [b]), defendant contends only that the sentence is unduly harsh and severe. We reject that contention. We note, however, that the certificate of conviction incorrectly reflects that defendant was convicted on January 6, 2013, and it must therefore be amended to reflect that he was convicted on January 6, 2014 (see People v Saxton, 32 AD3d 1286, 1286-1287).

Entered: December 23, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.