Beyer v Family Video Movie Club, Inc.

Annotate this Case
Beyer v Family Video Movie Club, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 00835 Decided on February 5, 2016 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on February 5, 2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, CARNI, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
101 CA 15-01066

[*1]PETER W. BEYER, JR., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

FAMILY VIDEO MOVIE CLUB, INC., ZOOM TAN, INC., AND ROCKFORD CONSTRUCTION CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.



LAW OFFICE OF JOHN WALLACE, BUFFALO, MAURO LILLING NAPARTY LLP, WOODBURY (ANTHONY F. DESTEFANO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

DOLCE PANEPINTO, P.C., BUFFALO (SEAN E. COONEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered February 12, 2015. The order granted the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability pursuant to Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) and denied the cross motion of defendants for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's Labor Law §§ 240 (1) and 241 (6) causes of action.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed on January 4, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 5, 2016

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.