Matter of Markman v Carrion

Matter of Markman v Carrion 2014 NY Slip Op 06435 Decided on September 26, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 26, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.
931 TP 14-00070

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF KEVIN MARKMAN, PETITIONER,

v

GLADYS CARRION, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES AND KELLY A. REED, COMMISSIONER, MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, RESPONDENTS.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County [John J. Ark, J.], entered January 9, 2014) to review a determination of the New York State Office of Children and Family Services. The determination denied petitioner's application to amend the indicated report of maltreatment to an unfounded report.

THE ABBATOY LAW FIRM, PLLC, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. ABBATOY, JR., OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

MERIDETH H. SMITH, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (PETER A. ESSLEY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT KELLY A. REED, COMMISSIONER, MONROE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES.

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination, made after a fair hearing, denying in part his request to amend an indicated report of maltreatment with respect to two of his children to an unfounded report, and to seal it (see Social Services Law § 422 [8] [a] [v]; [c] [ii]). We conclude that the determination is supported by substantial evidence and therefore decline to disturb it (see Matter of Arbogast v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., Special Hearing Bur., 119 AD3d 1454, 1454-1455; Matter of Parker v Carrion, 90 AD3d 512, 512). Where, as here, hearsay evidence is "sufficiently relevant and probative," it may constitute substantial evidence (People ex rel. Vega v Smith, 66 NY2d 130, 139; see Matter of Bullock v State of N.Y. Dept. of Social Servs., 248 AD2d 380, 382). The Administrative Law Judge credited the children's accounts of the incidents over petitioner's denials thereof, and we perceive no basis to disturb those credibility determinations (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443; Matter of Scaccia v Martinez, 9 AD3d 882, 883).

Entered: September 26, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court