Mascellino v Chick

Annotate this Case
Mascellino v Chick 2014 NY Slip Op 06706 Decided on October 3, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
901 CA 14-00141

[*1]DONNA MASCELLINO AND LUCIAN MASCELLINO, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v

ROBERT M. CHICK, D.D.S., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, SHAKEEL AHMAD, M.D., DONALD W. HOHMAN, JR., M.D., GRANT SORKIN, M.D., OCTAVIA F. BALAN, M.D. AND KALEIDA HEALTH, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Tracey A. Bannister, J.), entered October 17, 2013. The order denied the motion of defendants Shakeel Ahmad, M.D., Donald W. Hohman, Jr., M.D., Grant Sorkin, M.D., Octavia F. Balan, M.D., and Kaleida Health for summary judgment.



GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (MELISSA L. ZITTEL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.



Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on September 11, 2014,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: October 3, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.