People ex rel. Williams v Cully

Annotate this Case
People ex rel. Williams v Cully 2014 NY Slip Op 00792 Released on February 7, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Released on February 7, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
76 KAH 12-01964

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. JOSEPH WILLIAMS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

MALCOLM R. CULLY, SUPERINTENDENT, COLLINS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


Appeal from a judgment (denominated amended decision and order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boller, A.J.), entered September 17, 2012 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment dismissed the petition.


CHARLES J. GREENBERG, AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner's appeal from the judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus has been rendered moot by his release to parole supervision (see People ex rel. Baron v New York State Dept. of Corr., 94 AD3d 1410, 1410, lv denied 19 NY3d 807), and the exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply (see id.; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715). While this Court has the power to convert the habeas corpus proceeding into a CPLR article 78 proceeding, we decline to do so under the circumstances of this case (see People ex rel. Keyes v Khahaifa, 101 AD3d 1665, 1665, lv denied 20 NY3d 862).
Entered: February 7, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.