Resetarits Constr. Corp. v Elizabeth Pierce Olmsted

Resetarits Constr. Corp. v Elizabeth Pierce Olmsted 2014 NY Slip Op 04632 Decided on June 20, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on June 20, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.
638 CA 13-01521

[*1]RESETARITS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., DEFENDANT. ELIZABETH PIERCE OLMSTED, M.D. CENTER FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIRED AND EPO-STOVROFF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORP., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, PHILADELPHIA INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered May 15, 2013. The order, among other things, granted that part of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment against defendant Elizabeth Pierce Olmstead, M.D. Center for the Visually Impaired.

JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (BEVERLY S. BRAUN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (ANDREW O. MILLER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567; CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

Entered: June 20, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court