People v Grosskopf

Annotate this Case
People v Grosskopf 2014 NY Slip Op 01911 Released on March 21, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Released on March 21, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
271 KA 12-02154

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

MARC A. GROSSKOPF, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered September 19, 2012. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.


KATHLEEN E. CASEY, BARKER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL J. VIOLANTE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking the sentence of probation imposed upon his conviction of attempted assault in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [2]) and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of incarceration. Contrary to defendant's contentions, we conclude that the violation of probation petition was not based on pretext and that the People established by the requisite preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated the terms and conditions of his probation (see CPL 410.70 [3]; People v Ortiz, 94 AD3d 1436, 1436, lv denied 19 NY3d 999).
Entered: March 21, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.