People v Sylar
Annotate this Case
People v Sylar
2014 NY Slip Op 01908
Released on March 21, 2014
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on March 21, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
267 KA 13-00124
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT SYLAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., A.J.), entered November 19, 2012. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see People v Vaillancourt, 112 AD3d 1375, 1375-1376; People v Guzman, 96 AD3d 1441, 1441-1442, lv denied 19 NY3d 812).
Entered: March 21, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on March 21, 2014
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
267 KA 13-00124
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
ROBERT SYLAR, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Frank P. Geraci, Jr., A.J.), entered November 19, 2012. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES ECKERT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs (see People v Vaillancourt, 112 AD3d 1375, 1375-1376; People v Guzman, 96 AD3d 1441, 1441-1442, lv denied 19 NY3d 812).
Entered: March 21, 2014
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
