Matter of Tuttle v Mateo

Annotate this Case
Matter of Tuttle v Mateo 2014 NY Slip Op 06760 Decided on October 3, 2014 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on October 3, 2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.
1043.2 CAF 14-00789

[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SUSAN TUTTLE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

v

BETH MATEO, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Ontario County (Maurice E. Strobridge, JHO), entered April 11, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The amended order denied the petition of respondent to terminate visitation.



DAVISON LAW OFFICE PLLC, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ROBERT L. GOSPER, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, CANANDAIGUA.



It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Tuttle v Mateo ([appeal No. 3] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 3, 2014]).

Entered: October 3, 2014

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.