Matter of Hawthorne v Hall
Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Hawthorne v Hall
2012 NY Slip Op 06702
Decided on October 5, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on October 5, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
956 CAF 11-01932
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF NINA E. HAWTHORNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
JASON L. HALL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Bobette J. Morin, R.), entered August 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
COURTNEY S. RADICK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO, FOR DECEMBER R.H.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Decided on October 5, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
956 CAF 11-01932
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF NINA E. HAWTHORNE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
JASON L. HALL, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Oswego County (Bobette J. Morin, R.), entered August 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition.
CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
COURTNEY S. RADICK, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OSWEGO, FOR DECEMBER R.H.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Hall v Hawthorne ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 5, 2012]).
Entered: October 5, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.