Blyashuk v Dhaliwal
Annotate this Case
Blyashuk v Dhaliwal
2012 NY Slip Op 06685
Decided on October 5, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on October 5, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
916 CA 11-01939
[*1]LYUDMILA V. BLYASHUK AND YEVEGNIY BLYASHUK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
GURPREET DHALIWAL, M.D., DILARA SAMADI, M.D., BUFFALO MEDICAL GROUP, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, RALPH SPERRAZZA, M.D. AND CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM, DOING BUSINESS AS SISTERS HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered July 20, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of plaintiffs' motion to compel defendants Gurpreet Dhaliwal, M.D., Dilara Samadi, M.D. and Buffalo Medical Group to produce certain documents regarding laparoscopic surgeries performed by Dilara Samadi, M.D.
GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (ANGELO S. GAMBINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LOTEMPIO & BROWN, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL H. KOOSHOIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and that part of the motion seeking to compel defendants to produce all documents regarding all laparoscopic surgeries performed by defendant Dilara Samadi, M.D. while he was an employee and shareholder of defendant Buffalo Medical Group, including, but not limited to, operative reports and billing records from 1997 through February 12, 2008, with patient names and identifying information redacted, is denied.
Decided on October 5, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
916 CA 11-01939
[*1]LYUDMILA V. BLYASHUK AND YEVEGNIY BLYASHUK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v
GURPREET DHALIWAL, M.D., DILARA SAMADI, M.D., BUFFALO MEDICAL GROUP, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, RALPH SPERRAZZA, M.D. AND CATHOLIC HEALTH SYSTEM, DOING BUSINESS AS SISTERS HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered July 20, 2011 in a medical malpractice action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of plaintiffs' motion to compel defendants Gurpreet Dhaliwal, M.D., Dilara Samadi, M.D. and Buffalo Medical Group to produce certain documents regarding laparoscopic surgeries performed by Dilara Samadi, M.D.
GIBSON, MCASKILL & CROSBY, LLP, BUFFALO (ANGELO S. GAMBINO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
LOTEMPIO & BROWN, P.C., BUFFALO (MICHAEL H. KOOSHOIAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and that part of the motion seeking to compel defendants to produce all documents regarding all laparoscopic surgeries performed by defendant Dilara Samadi, M.D. while he was an employee and shareholder of defendant Buffalo Medical Group, including, but not limited to, operative reports and billing records from 1997 through February 12, 2008, with patient names and identifying information redacted, is denied.
Same Memorandum as in Blyashuk v Dhaliwal ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 5, 2012]).
Entered: October 5, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
