People v Akinpelu
Annotate this Case
People v Akinpelu
2012 NY Slip Op 08976
Released on December 21, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1422 KA 12-00169
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
GORDY A. AKINPELU, ALSO KNOWN AS GORDY L. AKINPELU, ALSO KNOWN AS GORDY AKINPELU, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered January 19, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sexual act in the second degree.
FARES A. RUMI, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1422 KA 12-00169
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
GORDY A. AKINPELU, ALSO KNOWN AS GORDY L. AKINPELU, ALSO KNOWN AS GORDY AKINPELU, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered January 19, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sexual act in the second degree.
FARES A. RUMI, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
