Matter of Ragin v Dorsey
Annotate this Case
Matter of Ragin v Dorsey
2012 NY Slip Op 09242
Released on December 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1404 CAF 12-00016
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF RONALD DAVID RAGIN, III, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
LINDA DORSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 7.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie Bailey, J.), entered October 24, 2011. The order dismissed the petition.
ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
DAVID A. SHAPIRO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR AALIYAH R.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Released on December 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.
1404 CAF 12-00016
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF RONALD DAVID RAGIN, III, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
LINDA DORSEY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 7.)
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie Bailey, J.), entered October 24, 2011. The order dismissed the petition.
ALAN BIRNHOLZ, EAST AMHERST, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
DAVID A. SHAPIRO, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR AALIYAH R.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Matter of Ragin v Dorsey ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 28, 2012]).
Entered: December 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.