John Chong-Hwan Wee v National Grid
Annotate this Case
John Chong-Hwan Wee v National Grid
2012 NY Slip Op 08955
Released on December 21, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1361 CA 11-02326
[*1]DR. JOHN CHONG-HWAN WEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NATIONAL GRID, JOHN J. WEISBECK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, A.J.), entered September 16, 2011. The order denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration.
JOHN CHONG-HWAN WEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (JENNIFER CASTALDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984).
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1361 CA 11-02326
[*1]DR. JOHN CHONG-HWAN WEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
NATIONAL GRID, JOHN J. WEISBECK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Eric R. Adams, A.J.), entered September 16, 2011. The order denied plaintiff's motion for reconsideration.
JOHN CHONG-HWAN WEE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.
HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (JENNIFER CASTALDO OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984).
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
