Allen-bailey Tag & Label, Inc. v Beardsley
Annotate this Case
Allen-bailey Tag & Label, Inc. v Beardsley
2012 NY Slip Op 08953
Released on December 21, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1358 CA 12-01030
[*1]ALLEN-BAILEY TAG & LABEL, INC. AND L.C. PARTNERS, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DAVID E. BEARDSLEY AND LAURIE A. BEARDSLEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 5, 2012. The order, among other things, granted in part defendants' cross motion for summary judgment.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL F. KENEALLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SANTIAGO BURGER ANNECHINO LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. BURGER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1358 CA 12-01030
[*1]ALLEN-BAILEY TAG & LABEL, INC. AND L.C. PARTNERS, LLC, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v
DAVID E. BEARDSLEY AND LAURIE A. BEARDSLEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 5, 2012. The order, among other things, granted in part defendants' cross motion for summary judgment.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL F. KENEALLY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
SANTIAGO BURGER ANNECHINO LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. BURGER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
