People v Williams
Annotate this Case
People v Williams
2012 NY Slip Op 09213
Released on December 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
1328 KA 10-00172
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
ISIAH WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered January 21, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (eight counts), petit larceny (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree, identity theft in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree.
WILLIAM G. PIXLEY, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NICOLE M. FANTIGROSSI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, that part of defendant's omnibus motion seeking to suppress the identification testimony with respect to count 6 of the indictment is granted, and a new trial is granted on counts 3, 5, 6 and 8 through 15 of the indictment and count 7 of the indictment is dismissed without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charge under that count of the indictment to another grand jury.
Released on December 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.
1328 KA 10-00172
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
ISIAH WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered January 21, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (eight counts), petit larceny (two counts), grand larceny in the third degree, identity theft in the first degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree.
WILLIAM G. PIXLEY, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NICOLE M. FANTIGROSSI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law, that part of defendant's omnibus motion seeking to suppress the identification testimony with respect to count 6 of the indictment is granted, and a new trial is granted on counts 3, 5, 6 and 8 through 15 of the indictment and count 7 of the indictment is dismissed without prejudice to the People to re-present any appropriate charge under that count of the indictment to another grand jury.
Same Memorandum as in People v Williams ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 28, 2012]).
Entered: December 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
