Humphrey v Campany
Annotate this Case
Humphrey v Campany
2012 NY Slip Op 08943
Released on December 21, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1313 CA 12-01212
[*1]DONOVAN HUMPHREY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
EDWARD CAMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, BEN PENNETTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 5, 2012. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for a protective order.
ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (NICOLE C. PELLETIER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SLIWA & LANE, BUFFALO (STANLEY J. SLIWA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on December 21, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1313 CA 12-01212
[*1]DONOVAN HUMPHREY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
EDWARD CAMPANY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, BEN PENNETTA, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered April 5, 2012. The order, among other things, denied plaintiff's motion for a protective order.
ATHARI & ASSOCIATES, LLC, UTICA (NICOLE C. PELLETIER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
SLIWA & LANE, BUFFALO (STANLEY J. SLIWA OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Entered: December 21, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
