Matter of Perry
Annotate this Case
Matter of Perry
2012 NY Slip Op 07551
Released on November 9, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 9, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1271 CA 12-00731
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PERCY PERRY, DECEASED. - REV. BARNEY B. PERRY, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT; TRACEE MEGNA, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PERCY PERRY, DECEASED, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered July 15, 2011. The order denied the petition seeking to have petitioner designated the administrator of the estate of Percy Perry.
REV. BARNEY B. PERRY, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
GARY R. GAFFNEY, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate.
Entered: November 9, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on November 9, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.
1271 CA 12-00731
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF PERCY PERRY, DECEASED. - REV. BARNEY B. PERRY, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT; TRACEE MEGNA, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PERCY PERRY, DECEASED, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court, Erie County (Barbara Howe, S.), entered July 15, 2011. The order denied the petition seeking to have petitioner designated the administrator of the estate of Percy Perry.
REV. BARNEY B. PERRY, SR., PETITIONER-APPELLANT PRO SE.
GARY R. GAFFNEY, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision by the Surrogate.
Entered: November 9, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
