Matter of Nerber v Buell
Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Nerber v Buell
2012 NY Slip Op 07511
Released on November 9, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Released on November 9, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1161 CAF 11-02138
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ALAN V. NERBER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
LEIGH M. BUELL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (John F. Batt, J.), entered September 2, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded petitioner sole custody of the parties' child.
DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
LEIGH E. ANDERSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR ANTHONY N.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: November 9, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Released on November 9, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1161 CAF 11-02138
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF ALAN V. NERBER, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v
LEIGH M. BUELL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Niagara County (John F. Batt, J.), entered September 2, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded petitioner sole custody of the parties' child.
DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
LEIGH E. ANDERSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR ANTHONY N.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.
Entered: November 9, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
