Matter of Messer v Monroe County Water Auth.
Annotate this Case
Matter of Matter of Messer v Monroe County Water Auth.
2012 NY Slip Op 06462
Decided on September 28, 2012
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1001 OP 12-00495
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL E. MESSER, PETITIONER,
v
MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT.
Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department) to annul the determination of respondent.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. TANG OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.
BOYLAN CODE LLP, ROCHESTER (SHEILA M. CHALIFOUX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation to discontinue signed by the attorneys for the parties on June 20, 2012,
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Decided on September 28, 2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1001 OP 12-00495
[*1]IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL E. MESSER, PETITIONER,
v
MONROE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, RESPONDENT.
Proceeding pursuant to EDPL 207 (initiated in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department) to annul the determination of respondent.
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (DAVID M. TANG OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.
BOYLAN CODE LLP, ROCHESTER (SHEILA M. CHALIFOUX OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation to discontinue signed by the attorneys for the parties on June 20, 2012,
It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.
Entered: September 28, 2012
Frances E. Cafarell
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
