Curto v Diehl
Annotate this Case
Curto v Diehl
2011 NY Slip Op 09512
Decided on December 23, 2011
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 23, 2011
MOTION NO. (1003/11) CA 10-02024.
[*1]PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
MARK DIEHL AND MELISSA SCHMIGEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. (Filed Dec. 23, 2011.)
Decided on December 23, 2011
MOTION NO. (1003/11) CA 10-02024.
[*1]PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v
MARK DIEHL AND MELISSA SCHMIGEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ. (Filed Dec. 23, 2011.)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
