People v Jones
Annotate this Case
People v Jones
2011 NY Slip Op 08029
Decided on November 10, 2011
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on November 10, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1178 KA 10-00894
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
FARLIE JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), rendered April 16, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of endangering the welfare of a child.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A. MILLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2011
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Decided on November 10, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, SCONIERS, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.
1178 KA 10-00894
[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
v
FARLIE JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), rendered April 16, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of endangering the welfare of a child.
THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ROBERT L. KEMP OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A. MILLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Entered: November 10, 2011
Patricia L. Morgan
Clerk of the Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
