Lena C. Tedesco v A.P. Green Industries, Inc.
Annotate this Case
Tedesco v A.P. Green Indus., Inc.
2005 NY Slip Op 10080 [24 AD3d 1328]
Decided on December 22, 2005
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on December 22, 2005
MOTION NO. (1153/05) CA 05-00635.
[*1]LENA C. TEDESCO, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRANK J. TEDESCO, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF FRANK J. TEDESCO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND INSULATION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., DEFENDANT- APPELLANT. INSULATION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. (Filed Dec. 22, 2005.)
Decided on December 22, 2005
MOTION NO. (1153/05) CA 05-00635.
[*1]LENA C. TEDESCO, EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF FRANK J. TEDESCO, DECEASED, AND INDIVIDUALLY AS THE SURVIVING SPOUSE OF FRANK J. TEDESCO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND INSULATION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., DEFENDANT- APPELLANT. INSULATION DISTRIBUTORS, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.
PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER, GORSKI, AND LAWTON, JJ. (Filed Dec. 22, 2005.)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
